![]() ![]() I just want to know what do you think about this perspective. Don't get upset, cuz being DC fans doesn't mean we all have to like every DC product. Anyway, I'm sure some of you will understand what I mean, and some of you will get upset. ![]() Maybe it works better with villains like Victor Zsasz. Azzarello thinks that the nonsense violence makes the Joker more attractive, but that's not the main thing that we love from the Joker. A rapist Joker is unnecessary and Azzarello's novel exaggerates with its baseless violence. He just tries to have fun creating chaos. The Joker should never be related to money or lust. The Joker is more than just trying to impress the reader with nonsense brutality like when he skinned one of his henchmen. Batman deduces that Lupos brother Angel hired Croc to murder his sister. Storyline edit Batman investigates the murder of Elizabeth Lupo, believed to have been killed by Killer Croc. I know that the Joker has evolved through time during the 20th century, but, by now, it shouldn't evolve anymore, it has already developed a solid personality that shouldn't change. 'Batman: Broken City' is a DC Comics storyline that appeared in Batman 620625, written by Brian Azzarello and illustrated by Eduardo Risso. I think that this version of the Joker is okay when it doesn't mean changing the character entirely, and that's what Azzarello did in some way. Other people prefer a version of the Joker who is barely laughing and is only trying to be more brutal. I know that there are a lot of versions of the Joker, and I always prefered a balance between a violent criminal and a clown that is always trying to have fun and make jokes. I considered it an interesting story, but I hated what Azzarello did to the Joker. I just read Joker by Azzarello and Bermejo. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |